![]() ![]() On this view, Jesus’ work on the cross is necessary for forgiveness, but one need not believe in Jesus-and could outright reject Him-and still enjoy the benefits of the cross. ![]() We Christians happen to believe in Jesus because it’s “our thing.” Jesus, though, could be completely out of the picture and salvation could still be secured through other religions.Īs a point of information, this would be different from the “inclusivist” Roman Catholic view. If I’m understanding his view correctly, this would make him a pluralist-someone who says that other religions are legitimate and appropriate avenues to God and that the work of the cross is not necessary at all for salvation. Greg explains why there is no such thing as a pluralist Christian.Ī caller alerted me to the fact that apparently there’s a president of a Baptist college who believes Jesus is not necessary for salvation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |